by ecuedit » Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:38 pm
I have a VERY good example for you also good answer for your previous
question:
(if you look at the x axis you will see how clumsy the original map is
- look at the jumps: 100 200 200 200 100 100 200
- here you really have to think what you will do. Is it linear - NO
- what will you do --> the advantage is tuner experience)
I wont be talking about methodology of calculating the
precontrol value right now, maybe at some other topic because
it take some more time and it is a complicated map with bunch of
other connected problems.
Lets imagine you are working on your extreme tune and you are facing
a problem with rail pressure deviation at 2500rpm and 1200bar
at full throttle from 2200+ in 5th gear.
Your car starts struggling. The original map looks like
attached and you want to know how much % the valve is closed
at that RPM and pressure in comparison with your diag measurement.
Lets say your diag shows 43, you want to be sure how ECU calculates,
now you check the map what the map has to say...
AXIS X: 1100-->1300
AXIS Y: 2000rpm-->3000rom
It is: (40.5 + 47.36 + 39 + 45) / 4 = 42.96 (look at the picture)
You can see that ECU calculates like that because you measured 43..
Lets imagine you increased IQ, Rail pressure, ID and so on,
and you recalculate you need more closed valve...
For example, lets say you calculated you need 46%,
now you know WHAT you have to do, to get there and WHERE.
Hope you understand.
You do not have permissions to view the files yet. You have to be registered and you have to make at least 3 quality / unique posts.