Rate my first tune BMW e46 320d 110kw

Help and tips about your tune, post your work in here.

Return to Rate My Tune

Rate my first tune BMW e46 320d 110kw

Postby Citroen032 » Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:49 pm

Please, rate my tune.


sw: 1037 36 1811
You do not have permissions to view the files yet. You have to be registered and you have to make at least 3 quality / unique posts.

Citroen032
Silver
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:21 pm
Location: Serbia

Re: Rate my first tune BMW e46 320d 110kw

Postby Citroen032 » Wed Jan 18, 2017 2:55 pm

Please check my tune.

Citroen032
Silver
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:21 pm
Location: Serbia

Re: Rate my first tune BMW e46 320d 110kw

Postby Citroen032 » Thu Jan 19, 2017 1:18 am

Anyone?

Citroen032
Silver
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:21 pm
Location: Serbia

Re: Rate my first tune BMW e46 320d 110kw

Postby Gregotovar » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:23 pm

Hi. Yes. It's really bad.
1-First I do not know why torque limiter increased 24% all over the line and then 19X1 torque map is not modified.
Very bad this section. The torque line must be changed progressively, and it should also go down from the maximum power figure or the maximum injected amount you want to reach.
2-Lambda unmodified. This is limiting your limited maximum amount of diesel, which does not matter what you do with torque maps until this map limits the total amount of fuel.
3-I do not know why you all have the stupid habit of changing the duration maps when they come in this case for 85 mg.
Apart from this modified the entire map by 9%. Fatal.
4-Nm to IQ well because you have not exceeded 400Nm but the duration maps say you inject more FALSE amount.
5-SOI unchanged, none.
6-Turbo geometry map, unmodified, then the pressure you demand ...
7 -... wrong, it is not going to be reached, and apart it is modified by 6% on the whole line, not for high fuel rates which is what I would do.
8-SVBL untouched, no more than 2400 mbar (F2A68).
9-SVRPL untouched
10-Rail pressure, not bad at all except the same, 2% in the whole map, less at the beginning and something else at the end, although it does not matter because SVRL is not modified (E11F4) 16000.


With all this the file is pretty poor for me. Of course, do not take this as anything personal, because it was what you asked for, and it should be said that in principles you always work this way, and it is not anyone's fault, but to have more experience.

I am also wrong, of course, and it should be noted that this is only my opinion, I do not have the absolute reason at all maybe ...

And one thing I've learned from this world.
Not because the car has a faster feeling, it means the file is correct.

Regards

Gregotovar
Bronze
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2015 12:37 am
Location: Spain

Re: Rate my first tune BMW e46 320d 110kw

Postby Citroen032 » Fri Jan 20, 2017 10:32 pm

Gregotovar wrote:Hi. Yes. It's really bad.
1-First I do not know why torque limiter increased 24% all over the line and then 19X1 torque map is not modified.
Very bad this section. The torque line must be changed progressively, and it should also go down from the maximum power figure or the maximum injected amount you want to reach.
2-Lambda unmodified. This is limiting your limited maximum amount of diesel, which does not matter what you do with torque maps until this map limits the total amount of fuel.
3-I do not know why you all have the stupid habit of changing the duration maps when they come in this case for 85 mg.
Apart from this modified the entire map by 9%. Fatal.
4-Nm to IQ well because you have not exceeded 400Nm but the duration maps say you inject more FALSE amount.
5-SOI unchanged, none.
6-Turbo geometry map, unmodified, then the pressure you demand ...
7 -... wrong, it is not going to be reached, and apart it is modified by 6% on the whole line, not for high fuel rates which is what I would do.
8-SVBL untouched, no more than 2400 mbar (F2A68).
9-SVRPL untouched
10-Rail pressure, not bad at all except the same, 2% in the whole map, less at the beginning and something else at the end, although it does not matter because SVRL is not modified (E11F4) 16000.


With all this the file is pretty poor for me. Of course, do not take this as anything personal, because it was what you asked for, and it should be said that in principles you always work this way, and it is not anyone's fault, but to have more experience.

I am also wrong, of course, and it should be noted that this is only my opinion, I do not have the absolute reason at all maybe ...

And one thing I've learned from this world.
Not because the car has a faster feeling, it means the file is correct.

Regards


Thanks for your time and fot your sugestions, I am new in tuning. I use ECM Titanium, I know that is bad software, but I start learnig with that. Can you send me any guide, tutorial anything for learning.

Thanks!

Citroen032
Silver
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:21 pm
Location: Serbia


Return to Rate My Tune

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests