franz727272 wrote:Where do you add new colums to get more fuel?
On SOI or on rail?
in both?
If I have the last columns on rail an soi set to 75 mg/str and I rise up to 80 mg/str I'll get more fuel, just changing x axis table? :?
The ECU will interpolate the last column with the last column.
In other words If last SOI column is 75mg and you request 80mg...the ECU will uses the 75mg values.
That can be very dangerous unless 65, 70 and 75mg are all identical anyway.
If the last values are identical for the high IQ values than it wouldnt really matter.
The problem is where the high IQ values are not the same.
For those tables you need to delete exisiting columns and create new columns.
Use linear inerpolation to fill in the new columns.
Ideally its best to find all tables that use 75mg and modify the axes.
For the civic, 4 of the SOI tables only hit 70 mg and add a 7.5mg column instead.
This 7.5mg table can create a major issue with the linear interpolation.
So personally instead of using 75mg @ 5mg increments... I would modifiy the tables to be 90mg @ 6 mg increments.
This would alllow you to map IQs greater than 75mg as good as possible.
You can use 6, 9, 12mg for the 70mg SOI tables with a max of 84mg in the last column.
[NB NM>iq tables and such also need upgrading to suit.]
The duration tables only extend to 100mm3 anyway = 83~84mg
I think requesting fuel higher than this would simply not be worth it..
83MG *(2.204 LB PER KG/1000000) * (2000RPM *2 STROKES) * 60MIN = 39.672 LB HR FUEL USE @ 2000RPM
83MG *(2.204 LB PER KG/1000000) * (4000RPM *2 STROKES) * 60MIN = 79.344 LB HR FUEL USE @ 4000RPM
43.90368 /0.34 = 129.1 BHP @ 2000RPM (129.1 *5252/2000RPM = 339.1 LB FT)
87.80736 /0.38 = 231.1 BHP @ 4000RPM (231.1 *5252/4000RPM = 303.4 LB FT)
340 lb ft & 231 bhp is pretty much hyrbid turbo fueling anyway.
http://www.celtictuning.co.uk/pages/pub ... ge%203.pdf